The time
finally came for the purchase of a Beeman P-1
airpistol. After owning and shooting many Webley
springer airpistols I now
wanted to try the famous P-1.
I located a
Weihrauch dealer in Canada who stocked the .22
caliber HW45 (aka P-1) so I ordered one. A
week later it was in my hands. The .22
caliber version is rated below 500fps so it is
not classed as a restricted firearm in Canada.
The velocity rating from Weihrauch states 130m/s
which converts to 426fps. No pellet weight is
mentioned with this rating.
The HW45
measures 11" from the muzzle to the end
of the hammer
spur (barrel latch). The weight is 2lbs 8.8oz
according to my digital
postal scale. The grips are slab sides and appear
to be walnut.
The P-1 shows close resemblance to the Colt
1911 frame.
Cocking
the HW45 is similar to the Webley Tempest
except the barrel is housed in the upper frame.
It is still an over-lever design like the
Webley. Cocking effort is a bit stiff but I have
no trouble shooting 60 or more pellets in
a session.
The
trigger on the HW45 is a two stage design that is
adjustable for weight. I have not yet tinkered
with the trigger on my gun but it
feels crisp and acceptable. The data from
the factory states a 28oz adjusted pull weight,
out of the box. This seems about right.
Testing the
velocity with the HW45 was an easy task but accuracy
testing was a bit of a challenge. Many springer pistols
don't perform well when shot off a sandbag rest so I
originally avoided this after an initial trial.
I found that resting my forearms on a firm pillow and
letting the pistol sit only in my hands worked okay. This
technique does not give a totally clear indication of top
accuracy potential but it's better than unsupported
offhand shooting. I also did plenty of unsupported
offhand shooting to get an idea of the shootability
of this gun. Ergonomics, balance, recoil, trigger feel,
and shootability can all be evaluated through
offhand shooting. This type of shooting will show how the
gun functions without the aid of a rest.
The first 5 shots from this new pistol were definitely
dieseling and were accompanied by the familiar burnt oil
smell and loud noise upon firing. This is expected
from a new springer airgun with excess oils creating too
much fuel. By the 25th shot the gun was producing
consistent velocity readings with close spreads within
shot strings. Energy output at this point was 6.05 to 6.20
foot-pounds with various pellet types.
The fastest pellet tested was the 11.9gr RWS Hobby with
an average velocity of 482fps. The 13.9gr Meisterkugeln
was pushed out at 448fps which produced 6.20 ftlbs.
A sample velocity series during the first few tests would
go something like this: 429, 422, 419, 430, 432fps (15gr
FTS pellets). After approximately 250 pellets my .22
caliber HW45 seems to have settled down to a constant
velocity output. A slight velocity drop happened after
about 100 pellets and seemed to stay at this level.
Energy output is now 5.6 to 5.8ftlbs. The Hobby pellet
now averages 461fps and the Meisterkugeln does 433fps. A
sample velocity with FTS pellets would be: 419, 416, 414,
413, 417fps. The gun lost about 5% energy which is
nothing to really cry about. With a future moly lube
treatment I may even get this power back again.
Velocity averages are now as
follows: RWS
Hobby (11.9gr) ------------- 461fps RWS
Meisterkugeln (13.9gr) - 433fps Crosman
WC(14.3gr) ------------ 428fps
Beeman FTS (15gr) -------------- 416fps
I have put over 300 pellets through the HW45 and
velocity is still stable. Waxed pellets (Pledge
polish) have been used for the last couple of shooting
sessions and accuracy is about the same. Before
I last put the gun down I shot a few more FTS
pellets through the chronograph and obtained the
following: 416, 423, 416 423, 417fps
(Ave= 419fps, 5.85ftlbs).
For accuracy testing I did
some offhand shooting using an isosceles stance and
also some with my forearms supported by a padded
rest.
Testing a
recoilling springer pistol can be a bit difficult because
the groups can be erratic if the gun contacts any firm
surface during the firing cycle. Freely holding the
pistol seemed to give best results. These results are
subject to my sighting error and shooting ability and are
not nearly as precise as a clamped style or sandbag rest
which can be used with other types of airpistols. In any
case the results do show accuracy tendencies and
shootability of the gun. After testing is completed it is
the shootability that really counts and offhand shooting
shows this tendency.
Offhand
shooting with the HW45 was performed with a moderate/light
grip pressure. The gun was allowed to recoil freely. I
found a good follow-through was important for tight
groups.
My first
offhand group was 10 shots with FTS pellets which formed
a cluster measuring 1.5"ctc at the standard 10
meter distance. Two more offhand groups of five shots
each with FTS pellets both produced nice 1.25"ctc
groups. No bad for my ability. I shot another five
shot group using RWS Hobby pellets and it was
my best at slightly over 1"ctc.
Next I used a pad rest to support my forearms while I
shot a few more 5 shot groups at 10 meters. The Beeman
FTS pellets made a nice 3/4"ctc group and Crosman
WCs went into 1"ctc. With the RWS Meisterkugelns and
CZ Boxer pellets I pulled one shot in each 5 shot group.
To make sure it was just me, I shot a 6th pellet which
went right into the main group cluster both times. With
the 5 good pellets counting the Meisters and Boxers shot
7/8" and 3/4"ctc respectively.
The best rested 5 shot group of the day went to the RWS
Hobby pellet. A beautiful 9/16"ctc group that could
be covered by a quarter.
Overall I feel the HW45 is an accurate springer pistol.
With an optical sight and a better shooter this gun
should be capable of consistent cloverleaf groups at 10
meters.
The next testing day I shot a bunch more offhand groups
with the HW45. I am amazed at how easy this springer
pistol is to shoot at 10 meters, compared to
the many Webley's I have owned. All groups were measured
with a ruler for center-to-center group size. All groups
were shot offhand with a two hand isosceles hold.
My final test was
offhand shooting but at longer distances. I measured off
10,15,20 and 30 yards with my tape and tin cans were
placed at these distances. The 10oz Campbells soup cans
at 10&15 yards, the 14oz Heinz bean cans at 20 yards
and the 28oz tomato cans at 30 yards.
Approximate tin can sizes are as follows:
10oz Campbells soup can - 2.5"Dia
x 4"H
14oz Heintz bean can --------3"Dia
x 4.5"H
28oz Tomato can -------------- 4"Dia
x 4.5"H
All shooting today was offhand
with an isosceles stance, a light grip, and
Beeman FTS pellets. No rest was used.
At 10 yards the 5 small Campbells soup cans toppled with
no misses. This performance was easily
repeated before moving to 15 yards.
At 15 yards I nailed 4/5 the first time and 5/5 the
second time. The soup cans toppled and sometimes
rolled back 2 yards when hit. Penetration at 10&15
yards was through both sides of the can.
At 20 yards I hit 5/5 Heinz bean cans and I repeated this
again with the same results. All cans flipped over. With
3 of these cans the pellet went through both sides. With
2 cans the pellet went through one side.
At 30 yards I hit 3/5 tomato cans on the first try. I
repeated this again. At the end of the day I hit 5/5
at 30 yards. The can will sometimes fall at this distance
but not always. There was always a big dent and
sometimes the pellet rips a slot in one side of the can.
Next I pulled out the Beeman P-3 (aka HW40) for
comparison. With this single stroke pneumatic pistol I
used lubed CPL pellets. The same cans were used at the
same distances.
At 15 yards I hit 5/5 soup cans. All cans fell over with
satisfying results.
At 20 yards I hit 5/5 bean cans. All cans flopped over
but didn't move much.
At 30 yards I hit 4/5 tomato cans. I shot a 6th pellet
and hit the can. Only one can flopped over and the rest
didn't move when hit. A satisfying "tink" sound
can be heard to indicate a hit. When shooting at 30 yards
I can see the pellet from about 25 yards onwards as is
connects the can. The recoilless behavior of the P-3
makes this possible.
When shooting these two fine air pistols I do not use
holdover. The guns are sighted in for 10 meters. At 10
and 20 yards I hold on the can. At 30 yards I expose
more of the front sight blade above the rear notch. This
allows me to aim at the can at all times. It works for me.
Testing the HW45 in a machine type rest is a difficult
process do to the cocking cycle and the pistol's recoil.
I decided to give it a try even though the results
will not likely be 100% perfect. During this test I
removed the grip panels and clamped the HW45 into a Black
and Decker Workmate. For every shot the gun was removed
and cocked and then returned to the clamped position.
Care was taken to re-align the 9 power Bushnell Sportsman
scope for every shot. All groups were 5 shots each and
measured center-to-center with a ruler and recorded to
the nearest sixteenth of an inch. The averages were
converted to decimal for ease of comparison. I ran out of
Hobby pellets so I could not shoot 4 groups with them.
There was an
annoying wind present when the 20 yard shooting was
performed which may have effected the group sizes a bit.
Overall I think the HW45 is likely capable of a bit
less than 1/2" groups at 10 meters (5 shot) and
close to 1" groups at 20 yards, if a better vise was
used. The Workmate is not the most stable system to use
but it's all I have.
I believe Beeman advertises .30"ctc 3 shot
group accuracy for the .177 caliber P-1 and .31"
for the .20 caliber. My groups are 5 shots each but
I have had some nice cloverleaf 3 shot groups before
completing my full 5 shots. I just found out the 18th
edition of Beeman's catalogue has the .22 caliber P-1
listed along with the data. Apparently the accuracy
is rated at .40"ctc (at 10m) and muzzle velocity is
450fps. My HW45 seems to be shooting perfect
at 471fps with 11.9gr Hobby pellets. We all know Beeman
uses the lightest pellet for their velocity testing. My
average accuracy with the favoured pellet is .53"
for 5 shot groups at 10 meters. Beeman uses 3 shot
groups at the same distance. My accuracy seems about the
same as that found by Beeman. Overall I found this
particular HW45 to be very comparable to the data Beeman
has printed. With a tune this pistol might even
perform better. It is currently in unaltered factory form.
After all my group testing was completed I set up my
chonograph and ran a few pellets. This HW45 has now been
through the break-in period (600+ pellets) and velocity
seems to have stabilized and has not changed in the last
250 pellets. The following results were recorded:
A friend of mine purchased a new HW45 (aka
Beeman P-1) with a .177 caliber barrel. I had the
opportunity to test his pistol along side of my .22
caliber of the same make. Here are the results obtained
using the same chronograph.
Notes:
I did not have enough .22 Hobby pellets to test 5 shots.
- the .22
cal CPs were a very loose fit which may be the cause of
the low velocity
- the .177
cal CPs were a snug fit.